We actually used to switch over to Zoom from Teams whenever we had all-company updates because Teams couldn't cope so well with the large group. Zoom has a Focus mode feature that allows meeting organizers to choose whose videos appear during larger meetings to streamline what attendees can see on-screen and also preserve video quality. This is also probably why participant capacity on Teams is just 300, whereas Zoom allows for up to 1,000 participants (on Enterprise, or with the large meeting add-on). Teams is juggling a load of other collaboration features, which means making sacrifices-though minor-where video quality or connection are concerned. And it makes sense: Zoom is 100% focused on video conferencing, so its streaming quality is naturally going to be better.
#Skype vs zoom for teaching 1080p#
Zoom copes better with larger remote meetings and slow internetīoth Zoom and Teams are powerful video conferencing software, and on paper, they're neck and neck when it comes to video resolution (both offer HD resolution of 1080p at 30fps, if that means anything to you).īut it's pretty well understood that Zoom tends to be better at coping with larger meetings, and at keeping people in the call even if they have a bad internet connection. This just isn't the kind of thing Zoom is designed to do.
(Zoom only offers 5-10 GB, depending on your plan.) We moved all our process documentation from shared folders to the Teams Wiki so that they were available to access anywhere. Zapier helps with that, by automatically uploading Zoom recordings to Google Drive, or anywhere else, but Teams has it built in.īecause Teams is meant to integrate into the day-to-day of running an organization, it also includes above-and-beyond features like 1 TB of space-per user-to store company documentation and a Wiki for processes. With Zoom, you need to go out of your way to send the recording to whoever needs it (or chase down the host if you're a guest). For example, in Teams, the recording is emailed out to all invitees and is saved in the meeting chat window, so it's easily traceable without you having to do anything. Zoom and Teams both offer video recording and transcripts (basic features for a video conferencing app), but once again, Teams has some built-in productivity features that take it up a level. And Zoom doesn't have any features that even hold a candle to it. ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 1080p at 30fps, but can slow down due to extra chat/collaboration featuresġ,000 (on Enterprise package or with large meeting add-on), 300 otherwiseħ00+, tightly integrated with Microsoft 365, and ZapierĪs someone who hates it when meetings lose focus, I love this feature. ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 1080p at 30fps handles slow internet better ⭐⭐⭐⭐ App needed to join from mobile devices, but otherwise streamlined
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Easy to join from any device, even without an account ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Noise reduction available, but device settings are slightly less customizable ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Advanced, including noise reduction and light adjustment depending on your environment ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Extensive collaboration features, including robust chat, whiteboard, action item lists, and a Wiki ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Screen sharing, remote control access, whiteboard and chat features Meeting collaboration and productivity features
0 kommentar(er)
